Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of some Methods for Preparing Gliclazide-β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes.

N P Sapkal1 , V A Kilor1, K P Bhusari2, A S Daud3

1Gurunanak College of Pharmacy, Near Dixit Nagar, Nari, Nagpur-440024. INDIA.; 2Sharad Pawar College of Pharmacy, Wanadongri, Nagpur.; 3Zim Laboratories Ltd. Kalmeshwar, Nagpur..

For correspondence:-  N Sapkal   Email: nidhi_sapkal@yahoo.co.in   Tel:+91-9422815111

Published: 25 December 2007

Citation: Sapkal NP, Kilor VA, Bhusari KP, Daud AS. Evaluation of some Methods for Preparing Gliclazide-β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes.. Trop J Pharm Res 2007; 6(4):833-840 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v6i4.6

© 2007 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: Gliclazide has been found to form inclusion complexes with β- cyclodextrin (β-CD) in solution and in solid state. The present study was undertaken to determine a suitable method for scaling up gliclazide-β-CD inclusion complex formation and to evaluate the effect of some parameters on the efficiency of complexation.
Method: The solid inclusion complexes of gliclazide and β-cyclodextrin were prepared at a molar ratio of 1:1 and 1:2 by mixing, kneading, and coprecipitation methods both on small and large scales. The effect of parameters such as kneading time and temperature on complexation was also studied. Characterization was performed using infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffractometry, and dissolution studies. In vitro release studies were carried out in phosphate buffer (pH 6.8).
Result: All the methods of preparation of complexes were found to be useful in increasing the solubility of gliclazide except mixing method where the rise in solubility was not significant. Both kneading and co-precipitation methods in 1:2 molar ratios were found to be equally effective in improving the solubility of gliclazide. The formation of inclusion complexes was evident in these formulations as shown by IR and XRD studies. But when carried out on a large scale, co-precipitation method was found to be more tedious and time-consuming than kneading method. Moreover percent recovery of complexes in the kneading method was found to be 98.76% as compared to 92.05% in case of co-precipitation method. 
Conclusion: Drug content studies, IR spectroscopic studies, X-Ray diffractometry studies and in vitro dissolution study data indicated that inclusion complexes prepared by kneading method in 1:2 molar ratios were suitable for improving the solubility of gliclazide. The same formulation was prepared at large scale and optimum formulation conditions were established.
 

Keywords: Gliclazide, Inclusion complexes, ^6;-cyclodextrin, Kneading

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates